|
|
||
|
Antidoping | TUE Appeals | Appeals |Other sports-related disputes | Pro-bono lawyer scheme Anti-Doping ProceedingsAnti-doping proceedings will usually be brought by Drug Free Sport New Zealand (but possibly an NSO in certain circumstances) when they consider that there is sufficient information or evidence that an anti-doping violation has taken place. For example, this may be on the basis of an athlete returning a positive drug test result or refusing to provide a sample for drug testing. Proceedings may also be brought on the basis of evidence supporting other alleged anti-doping violations such as trafficking in prohibited substances. The organisation bringing the proceedings is referred to as ‘the applicant’ and the athlete or other person alleged to have committed the offence is known as the ‘defendant’. The Tribunal has the jurisdiction to decide whether an anti-doping violation has been committed and to decide the appropriate penalty for such a violation. Depending on their anti-doping policy, an NSO can apply to the Tribunal to have an athlete, who Drug Free Sport has notified them has returned an adverse finding (such as testing positive to a prohibited substance), provisionally suspended until the Tribunal can hear and determine the matter. Such provisional suspension applications are often made before Drug Free Sport has referred the matter to the Tribunal. A provisional suspension prevents the athlete participating in the sport of the NSO. The Tribunal usually hears provisional suspension applications urgently. Steps in anti-doping proceedings
|
||